CSC assessment archive
The article says the CSC assessment process was built to make prisoners fail
This 2011 archive is short, but it exposes a serious claim about Close Supervision Centres: the official language of assessment hid a process of segregation, provocation, psychological reporting and selection into a system Kevan has repeatedly described as harmful and punitive.
How the system is introduced
The archive describes how the CSC system was created and how assessment felt from inside
In 1998 the Labour government introduced the Close Supervision Centre (CSC) system. CSCs are a type of control unit. A prisoner with recent experience of the CSC system reports on the 'assessment' process for moving prisoners from the mainstream into the CSCs.
Official language versus reality
The article says the manual gave the system a respectable public face
CSC assessment may seem acceptable if you read the CSC Manual and Operating Standards; however in reality the Prison Service Instructions are nothing but a public face to cover the disturbing practices of the CSC.
Before assessment
The account says prisoners were weakened before the report was written
CSC selection is supposed to be based upon individual risk assessment; however, prior to assessment, prisoners are kept in segregation for a lengthy period, severely abused and isolated; then, while the prisoners are in this vulnerable state, Woodhill prison CSC sends a trainee psychologist to extract the answers they require to write a report.
Assessment pressure points
The archive describes a system that searched for pressure points, then used them
The article does not describe one isolated problem. It describes a method: review a prisoner's files, find previous complaints or reactions, target the areas most likely to cause distress, then treat the distress as proof that the prisoner belongs in the CSC.
Provocation described
The article names visits, mail, food and false threat allegations as pressure tactics
Staff read through prisoners' files to find any complaints they have entered or any times prisoners have reacted violently; this is to know what buttons to push to get a reaction. Then their games start... Complained about visits before - then maybe your visitors are denied access to the prison. Problems with mail - your mail could now be completely stopped. Complained about food - your meal choice could now be wrong every day. Reacted violently in the past - there will be repeated false allegations of your making threats. Whatever each prisoner has had problems with is used in an attempt to provoke the most extreme reaction.
No-win framing
The prisoner is described as trapped whichever way he responds
The prison knows exactly it is doing. If the prisoner doesn't become more volatile, the psychologist will say that they are attempting to manipulate the staff into believing they are not dangerous. If the prisoner complains about the provocation, then he is demonstrating 'administrative violence' in an attempt to waste prison management's time through unfounded complaints. A violent reaction and the referral was correct - the prisoner is a clear danger and must be selected.
The warning
The final paragraph says the CSC could push prisoners toward psychiatric crisis
So what actually is the purpose of the CSC? To remove prisoners who have caused an embarrassment to the Prison Service as a punishment and have them in permanent segregation until they go crazy. For those who end up on CSC, the odds of getting off it are highest if your next stop is to be Broadmoor, Rampton or Ashworth. If you don't have a mental disorder and do not want one, then avoid the Close Supervision Centre system!
Why it matters for Kevan
The article explains the machinery around Kevan's prison fight
Kevan's innocence fight has had to continue inside prison conditions that he says were designed to isolate, provoke and discredit prisoners. This archive matters because it describes the mechanism: official risk language on the surface, extreme control underneath, and psychological reports shaped after pressure had already been applied.
Public support
Messages of support
Show your support for Kevan or comment on this article.
Sign in to leave support
New messages appear after admin approval.
Sign in to add support